|
Goldman, Alvin I.
Board of Governors Professor, Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2006 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-513892-4 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0195138929.003.0005
Abstract: Modularists claim that folk psychology is mediated by an innate modularized database, the structures of which support inferences concerning representational relations like belief, desire, and pretense. It is doubtful, however, that mindreading really qualifies as modular, specifically, that it satisfies Fodor’s chief criteria of modularity: domain specificity and informational encapsulation. Alan Leslie postulates a core module called the “theory of mind mechanism”, but most of the work in assigning mental states is done by the “selection processor”, which is a non-modular mechanism. Finally, no real evidence is provided that propositional attitudes are ascribed via theoretical inference rather than simulation.
Keywords: domain specificity, Fodor, informational encapsulation, Leslie, modularity, pretense, selection processor, theory of mind mechanism,
|
|
|
|
|