Simulating Minds
The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading
Goldman, Alvin I. Board of Governors Professor, Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2006
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-513892-4







doi:10.1093/0195138929.003.0004

Alvin I. Goldman
Abstract: Early childhood failures on false-belief tasks and related tasks lead many developmental psychologists to conclude that children (like scientists) undergo a succession of changes in their mental-state theories, especially changes from a non-representational to a representational theory. Early errors in belief attribution are viewed as the product of a “conceptual deficit” rather than performance limitations. Other evidence, however, suggests that performance factors like memory and inhibitory control problems are at least partly responsible. Recent experiments with reduced task demands enabled children as young as 15 months to show understanding of false belief. Child-scientist advocates usually hold that theoretical inference is used for both first-person and third-person mindreading, but there is evidence that undercuts first-person/third-person parallelism.

Keywords: conceptual deficit, false-belief tasks, inhibitory control, parallelism, performance limitations,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast