Haaparanta, Leila Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Tampere, Finland
Print publication date: 2009 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2009
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-513731-6







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195137316.003.0035

Tapio Korte
Ari Maunu
Tuomo Aho
Abstract: This chapter begins with a discussion of Kant's theory of judgment-forms. It argues that it is not true in Kant's logic that assertoric or apodeictic judgments imply problematic ones, in the manner in which necessity and truth imply possibility in even the weakest systems of modern modal logic. The chapter then discusses theories of judgment-form after Kant, the theory of quantification, Frege's Begriffsschrift, C. I. Lewis and the beginnings of modern modal logic, the proof-theoretic approach to modal logic, possible world semantics, correspondence theory, and modality and quantification.

Keywords: judgment-forms, Frege, modal logic, possible world semantics, correspondence theory, modality, quantification,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast