The Riddle of Hume's Treatise
Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion
Russell, Paul Professor of Philosophy, University of British Columbia
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-511033-3
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0006
 

Paul Russell
The central thesis of this chapter is that the scope and structure of Hume's Treatise is modeled or planned after that of Hobbes's The Elements of Law and that in this respect there exists an important and unique relationship between these two works. The immediate significance of this relationship between Hobbes's and Hume's project of the “science of man” is that it indicates the underlying unity and coherence of Hume's entire project in the Treatise. However, although the “plan” of the Treatise is modeled closely after Hobbes's work, we should not infer that there are no significant issues where Hobbes and Hume diverge. On the contrary, there are (several) significant issues where Hobbes and Hume do indeed diverge—an observation that is in no way inconsistent with the fact that Hume's project is modeled after Hobbes's similar project of a “science of man.” Nevertheless, once we recognize the nature and significance of Hume's Hobbist plan in the Treatise, we are in a position to excavate and systematically uncover Hume's fundamental irreligious intentions throughout the Treatise.
Keywords: Treatise of Human Nature,, Elements of Law,, Thomas Hobbes,, Hobbism,, Leviathan,, models (literary/philosophical),, science of man,, scientific method.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0006
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Riddles, Critics, and Monsters: Text and Context
Part II The Form and Face of Hume's System
Part III The Nature of Hume's Universe
Part IV THE ELEMENTS OF VIRTUOUS ATHEISM
Part V HUME'S PHILOSOPHY OF IRRELIGION