The Riddle of Hume's Treatise
Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion
Russell, Paul Professor of Philosophy, University of British Columbia
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-511033-3
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0002
 

Paul Russell
Although our own contemporaries are widely agreed that Hume's Treatise was largely unconcerned with problems and issues of religion (i.e. on the general assumption that he removed all such material from the Treatise) his early critics took a very different view. This way of reading Hume's Treatise is especially apparent in A Letter from a Gentleman to his friend at Edinburgh, a pamphlet composed by Hume in 1745 in reply to several accusations made against him when he applied for the chair of moral philosophy at Edinburgh University. Among the most important and fundamental “charges” made against Hume are those of “skepticism” and “atheism.” The nature and character of these charges and Hume's replies reveal the particular relevance and role of the (dogmatic) philosophy of Samuel Clarke in this context—as well as the philosophy of Clarke's prominent Scottish disciple Andrew Baxter.
Keywords: Letter from Gentleman,, Andrew Baxter,, argument a priori,, atheism,, Samuel Clarke,, deism,, freethinker,, Lord Kames (Henry Home),, minute philosopher,, William Wishart.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0002
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Riddles, Critics, and Monsters: Text and Context
Part II The Form and Face of Hume's System
Part III The Nature of Hume's Universe
Part IV THE ELEMENTS OF VIRTUOUS ATHEISM
Part V HUME'S PHILOSOPHY OF IRRELIGION