The Riddle of Hume's Treatise
Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion
Russell, Paul Professor of Philosophy, University of British Columbia
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-511033-3
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0018
 

Paul Russell
This chapter aims to provide a summary account of the nature and significance of the irreligious interpretation of the Treatise. The solution to the riddle of the Treatise begins with a critique of the “castration” hypothesis, which in its unqualified form is simply a myth. Contrary to this hypothesis, the Treatise is systematically concerned with and directly relevant to issues of religion. The irreligious interpretation plainly serves to explain the character of Hume's motivation in the Treatise as it relates to both his skeptical and naturalistic commitments. It also serves to explain what unites or relates the highly varied component arguments and discussions that appear throughout this work (in contrast with the established accounts which leave us with a work that is disjointed and fragmented).
Keywords: atheism (anti-Christian),, empiricism,, Hobbism,, irreligion,, naturalism,, Radical Enlightenment,, religion,, science of man,, secularism,, skepticism.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0018
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Riddles, Critics, and Monsters: Text and Context
Part II The Form and Face of Hume's System
Part III The Nature of Hume's Universe
Part IV THE ELEMENTS OF VIRTUOUS ATHEISM
Part V HUME'S PHILOSOPHY OF IRRELIGION