The Riddle of Hume's Treatise
Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion
Russell, Paul Professor of Philosophy, University of British Columbia
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-511033-3
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0017
 

Paul Russell
According to the irreligious interpretation, there are two key claims that Hume seeks to establish in the Treatise in respect of morality. The first is that Hume defends the “autonomy of morality” in relation to religion. The foundations of moral and political life, he holds, rest with our human nature, not with the doctrines and dogmas of (Christian) religion. Closely connected with this issue, Hume also aims to show that “speculative atheism” does not imply “practical atheism” or any kind of “moral licentiousness.” Taken together, these two components of Hume's moral system constitute a defence and interpretation of “virtuous atheism.”
Keywords: Pierre Bayle,, Samuel Clarke,, Thomas Hobbes,, Francis Hutcheson,, Bernard Mandeville,, moral skepticism,, moral sense,, naturalism (moral),, rationalism (ethical),, Lord Shaftesbury,, virtuous atheism.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195110333.003.0017
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Riddles, Critics, and Monsters: Text and Context
Part II The Form and Face of Hume's System
Part III The Nature of Hume's Universe
Part IV THE ELEMENTS OF VIRTUOUS ATHEISM
Part V HUME'S PHILOSOPHY OF IRRELIGION