Austin, J. L. late White's Professor of Moral Philosophy, University of Oxford
Urmson, J. O.
Warnock, G. J.
Print publication date: 1979 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-283021-0







doi:10.1093/019283021X.003.0005

J. L. Austin
J. O. Urmson
G. J. Warnock
Abstract: Deals with the question of whether there is a use of ‘is true’ that is the primary or generic name for that which at bottom we are always saying ‘is true’. Austin discusses the views that truth is primarily a property of beliefs and of true statements. He goes on to argue that the word ‘true’ denotes the validity of an intended (or expected) correspondence between a representation and what it represents, and dismantles confusions about the meaning of the words that underlie such a view, such as ‘fact that’ and ‘corresponds’.

Keywords: Austin, belief, correspondence, fact, meaning, property, representation, statement, truth,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast