Theatric Revolution
Drama, Censorship, and Romantic Period Subcultures 1773-1832
Worrall, David Professor of English Literature, The Nottingham Trent University
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-927675-2







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276752.003.0002

David Worrall
Abstract: This chapter argues that Romantic period drama for the stage has been neglected. A critical paradigm of denial has emerged in which some recent critical work either distorts the analysis it claims to represent or cannot be verified by inspection of the archives. Other modern commentators have underestimated the degree of political or commercial intrusion. Beleaguered actresses such as Elizabeth Macauley (who wrote a pamphlet called Theatric Revolution) and hard pressed ‘illegitimate’ managers such as John Palmer and Thomas John Dibdin sought to run theatres which did not have King Charles II’s Royal Patent, which granted to Covent Garden and Drury Lane a monopoly over all spoken drama, Shakespeare included. The theatrical regulatory environment was both complex and contradictory.

Keywords: censorship, paradigms, monopoly, Macauley, patentees,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast