|
López, Luis
University of Illinois, Chicago
Print publication date: 2009 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-955740-0 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.003.0005
Abstract: This chapter argues that there are three positions relevant for the interpretation of objects. Objects in Spec,v are interpreted as [+a]. Objects in Spec,V (or the higher spec position within the phase) can be interpreted as specific/referential or generic. Finally, objects in situ can only be interpreted as non-specific/non-referential. The optionality of specific readings contrasts with the obligatoriness of the [+a] feature and reinforces the hypothesis that only the edge of a phase is a locus for interpretation rules.
Keywords: discourse-anaphors, specificity, p-movement, clitic doubling, accusative A, scrambling, object shift,
|
|
|
|
|