Home > Subject index > Law > Table of contents > Chapter abstract
Hare, Ivan Barrister, Blackstone Chambers
Weinstein, James Amelia D. Lewis Professor of Constitutional Law, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University
Print publication date: 2009 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-954878-1







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0019

Carolyn Evans
Abstract: The struggle for gender equality has often been in direct conflict with religious teachings and other forms of speech enunciated by religious leadership. This chapter addresses the issue of religious speech that offends the value of gender equality and the question of how a liberal state should respond to such speech. It develops an argument that attempts to take seriously the legitimate claims of both religious speakers and women who are committed to gender equality, while also acknowledging that these two groups are not mutually exclusive. The chapter commences with some examples of religious hate speech that is harmful to notions of gender equality. It then outlines two models of speech (one liberal and one religious) and explains why neither gives adequate support to religious women who live in communities where religious speech that undermines gender equality is commonplace. Drawing on both religious freedom principles and feminist theory, the chapter argues that the liberal state should respond to religious speech that promotes gender inequality by the adoption of certain policies that empower women inside religious communities, enabling transgressive speech and refusing to give legitimacy to women-hating speech (even if not directly banning it).

Keywords: gender equality, religious freedom, hate speech, feminist theory, religious speech,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Introduction and Background
Part II Hate Speech
Part III Incitement to Religious Hatred and Related Topics
Part IV Religious Speech and Expressive Conduct that Offend Secular Values
Part V INCITEMENT TO, AND GLORIFICATION OF, TERRORISM
Part VI Holocaust Denial
Part VII Governmental and Self-Regulation of the Media