Home > Subject index > Law > Table of contents > Chapter abstract
Professor, Baderin, Mashood Professor of Law, SOAS, University of London
Professor, McCorquodale, Robert Professor of International Law and Human Rights, University of Nottingham
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-921790-8
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217908.003.0015
Sarah Joseph
This chapter addresses two anti-WTO critiques. First, it examines the argument that current WTO rules are biased in favour of developed states. Second, it examines the argument that trade liberalization, which has been facilitated, but certainly not completely achieved, by the WTO, is good for the poor, particularly in the developing world. The differing interests of the North and South are also discussed, bearing in mind that losers from economic globalization and poverty exist in developing and industrialized states. Finally, the chapter suggests a reform proposal which addresses some of the major Southern concerns, whilst also taking into account some of the concerns of Northern progressive groups.
Keywords: WTO, human rights, trade liberalization, economic globalization, developed states, developing world, North, South,
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217908.003.0015
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
PART I INTRODUCTION
PART II THE STRUCTURE AND SCOPE OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE ICESCR
PART III REGIONAL AND COMPARATIVE UNDERSTANDINGS OF ESC RIGHTS
PART IV APPLICATIONS OF ESC RIGHTS