Home > Subject index > Law > Table of contents > Chapter abstract
Forum Non Conveniens
History, Global Practice, and Future under the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements
Brand, Ronald A. Professor of Law and Director of Center for International Legal Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Jablonski, Scott R. The Law Firm of Scott R. Jablonski, P.L., Miami Beach, Florida
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2009
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-532927-8
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329278.003.0003
Ronald A. Brand
Scott R. Jablonski
This chapter details the history of the development of the doctrine of forum non conveniens in the United States, demonstrating an early inclination to allow judicial discretion to decline jurisdiction when there is a more appropriate forum in another jurisdiction. It traces the major cases in the U.S. Supreme Court, and reviews the application of the doctrine in lower courts. It also considers the impact on the doctrine of transfer rules within the federal court system, the relationship between the development of the doctrine in federal courts and in state courts, the relationship of the doctrine to basic issues of jurisdiction, and the difference (if any) in application of the doctrine when the plaintiff is local or foreign.
Keywords: forum non conveniens, declining jurisdiction, transfer rules, Gilbert, Koster, Piper Aircraft, comity, discretion to dismiss, forum selection, forum shopping,
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329278.003.0003
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast