Home > Subject index > History > Table of contents > Chapter abstract
Daybell, James Assistant Professor in Medieval and Early Modern History, Central Michigan University
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-925991-5







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199259915.003.0009

James Daybell
Abstract: This chapter, based on over 1,000 letters of petition or suitors' letters, outlines the range of patronage suits made by women, contributing to the re-examination of women's political roles in early modern England. Focusing on women's rhetorical and epistolary skills in petitioning for favour, this chapter examines the kinds of strategies employed by women in their letters of petition that are distinct from men's letters: tropes of female weakness and fragility for strategic effect; emphasis of the plight of widows; and the duty of wives, mothers and kinswomen to intervene on behalf of family and friends. Moreover, it posits a distinctly ‘feminine’ mode of petitioning — a ‘scripted’ female voice that could be appropriated by both men and women. It is argued that correspondence of this nature indicates women's easy familiarity in using a language of patronage and ‘political friendship’, suggestive of the confidence and authority with which women operated as patrons and intermediaries.

Keywords: letters of petition, suitors' letters, women and patronage, women's political roles, rhetorical strategies, women as patrons, women as intermediaries, scripted female voice,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast