|
Simmons, Christina
Associate Professor of History and Women’s Studies, University of Windsor
Print publication date: 2009 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2009 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-506411-7 doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195064117.003.0005 |
|
|
Novelists as well as reformers in the interwar period depicted three competing versions of companionate marriage. The most widespread was “flapper marriage,” which modernized but did not really confront male dominance. Its proponents acclaimed flapper wives who had rejected demure styles of femininity, but they demonized powerful matriarchs and independent career women. African Americans imagined “partnership marriage,” in which marital roles were less distinct, wives were often employed, and marriage was more anchored in wider kin and community networks. Black and white feminists sought “feminist marriage,” in which not only sex but also paid work and household labor involved greater equality between women and men. Although all versions accepted more individual freedom in style and public behavior than Victorian mores allowed, only African Americans seriously supported individual freedom to choose marriage partners across racial lines.
Keywords: flappers, interracial marriage, feminists, African Americans, partnership, matriarchs,
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195064117.003.0005
|
|