Institutions in Transition
Land Ownership, Property Rights and Social Conflict in China
Ho, Peter University of Groningen, Centre for Development Studies
Print publication date: 2005 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-928069-8
doi:10.1093/019928069X.003.0004
Peter Ho
Offers a detailed institutional analysis of national grassland policy. It is demonstrated that one of the main reasons for the failure of national grassland policy and the pasture lease system is the fact that both do not suit the current socio-economic parameters. In other words, they are ‘empty institutions’. The ‘empty institution’ incorporates rules that have not yet been widely accepted in society, yet in such way that these can have no real impact on the behaviour of social actors. An ‘empty institution’ generally arises from a compromise over sensitive political issues. In this case, national grassland policy reflects a political compromise over the core of grassland property rights: the distinction between state and collective property.
Keywords: grassland, pastoralism, policy implementation and failure,
doi:10.1093/019928069X.003.0004
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast