Pension Design and Structure
New Lessons from Behavioral Finance
Mitchell, Olivia S. International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Professor of Insurance and Risk Management, and Executive Director of the Pension Research Council at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
Utkus, Stephen P. Director of the Vanguard Center for Retirement Research, The Vanguard Group
Print publication date: 2004 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-927339-3
doi:10.1093/0199273391.003.0003
 

Elke U. Weber
This chapter argues that the lack of any visceral perception of risk or danger is the main obstacle to the retirement savings. It reviews theory and empirical evidence to document two claims: that affect is the wellspring of action; and that perceived risk, particularly visceral reactions to risky situations, has little correspondence to other measures of risk. It concludes by considering the implications of psychological models of decisionmaking for designing procedures or institutions that improve on the current situation.
Keywords: risk perception, risk management, decisionmaking, pension saving, retirement planning
doi:10.1093/0199273391.003.0003
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Research on Decisionmaking under Uncertainty
Part II Implications for Retirement Plan Design
Part III Consequences for Retirement Education
Part IV Implications for Retirement Payouts