Nussbaum, Martha Professor of Law and Ethics, University of Chicago
Sen, Amartya Master of Trinity College, Cambridge
Print publication date: 1993 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-828797-1







doi:10.1093/0198287976.003.0010

James Griffin
Abstract: Griffin expresses doubts regarding Brock's thesis that one can extract from medical ethics literature the outline of a general account of a good life. Griffin contends that while we need prudential values as the broad conception of the quality of life for our reasoning about the good life, there are moral and practical reasons to work with a narrower conception of the quality of life in making certain social decisions. If it is the case that we need several different conceptions of the quality of life for different kinds of social decision, then we need both the broad conception and an understanding of the various considerations at work in generating narrower conceptions.

Keywords: ethical judgments, healthcare, prudential values,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Lives and Capabilities
Part II Traditions, Relativism, and Objectivity
Part III Women's Lives and Gender Justice
Part IV Policy Assessment and Welfare Economics